Sarah Kane more: acontrolleddetonation |
A
Controlled Detonation:
Fragment One Impossible Love Fragment one begins the play like a prologue, with a vague question that appears directed to the audience:
The entire fragment appears again, verbatim, near the end of the play in fragment 23, during a bitter exchange between the speaker and a professional therapist or doctor. By following the pattern of dashes, we can discern that it is most likely the professional that is speaking these lines in fragment 23. However, it is unclear who may be speaking them in fragment one. The repetition of the question suggests its larger, thematic significance which could be expressed as what is the nature of the ties that bind human relations? Throughout the play, we learn how the central voice yearns for an unconditional and healing love, a supportive love that can subsume politics, money and fame; a love which transcends misunderstanding and death in short, an impossible love.
Kanes text is highly self-reflexive, as we will see in detail in fragment seven, and the question posed here at the start of the play may also be referring to the process of interpretation itself, to the relations between readers and texts and between spectators and actors. The question may be asking us to consider why we have gathered to witness the tragedy about to unfold. What do we, as an audience, have to offer in return for her sacrifice? Urban points out that this interactive relay is a vital and distinct part of the Kane experience: Her work lacks any pretense to authorial closure, for the directors, actors and event the readers of her plays become integral part of their meanings. (Urban 4) As with all the questions posed by the play, there are no clear answers. Copyright © 2007 Mustafa Sakarya reproduced on the site with the kind permission of the author |
click for next chapter
www.iainfisher.com / send mail / © 2000-2012 Iain Fisher